That’s the compelling, and persuasive, thesis of Roger
Knight’s Britain against Napoleon. While most
military history glorifies generals and admirals and has a “great man” focus,
several recent writers have explored the role played by planners and
technicians and managers – civil servants, lower-ranking officers, and private
businessmen.
Paul Kennedy did it for World War II in Engineers of Victory. As Amazon’s description says, “Kennedy
recounts the inside stories of the invention of the cavity magnetron, a
miniature radar “as small as a soup plate,” and the Hedgehog, a multi-headed
grenade launcher that allowed the Allies to overcome the threat to their
convoys crossing the Atlantic; the critical decision by engineers to install a
super-charged Rolls-Royce engine in the P-51 Mustang, creating a fighter plane
more powerful than the Luftwaffe’s; and the innovative use of pontoon bridges
(made from rafts strung together) to help Russian troops cross rivers and elude
the Nazi blitzkrieg.”
Arthur Herman showed in Freedom’s Forge the role played by
the auto and shipbuilding industry in building America’s arsenal of democracy.
Maury Klein paints a larger canvas in his
A Call to Arms.
Historian Thomas McCraw explained how Alexander Hamilton and
others developed a system of finance that allowed America to win its
revolutionary war and put its new government on a sound financial basis in his The Founders.
Knight shows how Britain drastically reorganized its
government after the loss of the American colonies and before the French
revolution. Prime Minister William Pitt the younger modernized the shipyards;
began a regular shipbuilding program while other nations enjoyed a peace
dividend; eliminated costly sinecure jobs in the military establishment; put
all the often-feuding navy offices under a single roof; and expanded the
intelligence services [though still allowing three separate organizations – in
the admiralty, foreign office, and home office – to remain independent]. As the
war continued under Napoleon, Knight tells how the British learned from their
mistakes and improved the efficiency of their government. They had numerous
setbacks and even disasters, along with numerous investigations and
parliamentary oversight, but those events combined to give Britain a more
capable force. It’s also fascinating to learn how informally governments
operated in that distant era.
No comments:
Post a Comment